Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 5, 1994No. CR 94-321PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Appellant Stanley Frank Boyd appeals from his conviction and forty year sentence for the rape of an eight-year-old girl. Three points of error are argued: a motion to suppress his statement to the police should have been sustained, a juror should have been excused for cause, and a mistrial should have been ordered because of the prosecutor’s closing argument. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

Motion To Suppress

Lt. J. R. Ashlock of the Carroll County Sheriff’s Office testified concerning a complaint for sexual molestation. He interviewed the alleged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Richmond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Linell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Sullinger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Bragg v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Peeler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API