Legal Opinion

Comptograph Co. v. Burroughs Adding Mach. Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 3, 1910No. 28,782PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Comptograph Company against the Burroughs Adding Machine Company.

1Opinion of the Court

KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judge, and SANBORN, District Judge.

This cause is now before the court upon plea to the bill setting up a license, to which replication was duly filed, and upon the evidence and other record presented with reference thereto.

The original bill charges infringement of patent No. 628,176, granted to Dorr E. Eelt on July 4, 1899, for a tabulating machine. Answer is'made as to claims 3 and 11 to 27 of the patent both inclusive. These claims are, however, withdrawn from consideration. The plea is to claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10, thereof, and to all of said claims except such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James G. Wilson v. George A. Sanford and Robert G. MusgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Hartell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Indiana Mfg. Co. v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
  4. Standard Dental Mfg. Co. v. National Tooth Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. McMullen v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Comptograph Co. v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  4. American Graphophone Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1911
  5. Comptograph Co. v. Burroughs Adding Mach. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API