State v. Keel
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
INMAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of driving while impaired ("DWI"). On appeal, defendant argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the two grossly aggravating factors found by the trial court and that the trial court erred by failing to submit the second grossly aggravating factor to the jury in violation of Blakely v. Washington,542 U.S. 296, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). After careful review, we agree and vacate defendant's sentence and remand for resentencing.
Factual and Procedural Background
On 25 June 2014, a jury convicted defendant of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. DeeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. DenningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016