Legal Opinion
Indianapolis v. Domhoff & Joyce Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1941No. 5851, No. 5851PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
For the purpose of exposing and emphasizing the conflicting views of the issues presented by this record, counsel have by close analysis developed four issues. We believe that they can be consolidated into two issues for the purpose of disclosing the reasons on which we have proceeded in arriving at our conclusion. These two issues are:(1) Was the certification and subsequent cashing of this check tendered in full satisfaction an accord and satisfaction under the circumstances?(2) Was the defendant-appellee debarred from availing itself of the defense of accord and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Morris v. . Windsor Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Mance v. . HossingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Britton v. . FerrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Testa v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Klever v. StowOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Kebe v. Nutro MacHinery Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kirk Williams Co. v. Six Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Morris Skilken & Co. v. Watkins Furniture Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.