Legal Opinion
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Tristano
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 6, 1990No. 88-3447PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
This ease arises out of the implementation of a drug abuse program by the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC”) for its employees in March of 1988. The employees are represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (“Union”). The drug program allows for the testing of urine and blood samples when there is “reasonable suspicion,” as determined by objective factors, that an employee is using drugs. If a test result is positive, the employee is entitled to have a second test conducted and to present evidence. If just cause is established,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoover v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Banks v. Secretary Of Indiana Family And Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees v. TristanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Cushing v. City Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Time Warner Cable v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995