Legal Opinion
Cranford v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1936No. S. F. 15727PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petitioner tendered to the respondent, as. Secretary of State, for filing, articles of incorporation of Transamerica Corporation which the respondent declined to file on the ground that the name “Transamerica Corporation” was not open for corporate use or adoption in this state. He seeks the writ of mandate to compel respondent to file the articles of incorporation. By leave of this court the Transamerica Service Corporation, a domestic corporation, and the Transamerica Corporation, have intervened on behalf of the respondent. The former of the two corporations acquired its name…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Rixford v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Cohen v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Delaware Charter Co. v. Delaware Charter Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Gospel Army v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- San Bernardino Fire & Police Protective League v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People Ex Rel. Fund American Companies v. California InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. PateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.