Legal Opinion

Carachure v. Scott

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 2021No. E074226Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/7/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO MARIA CARACHURE, Plaintiff and Appellant, E074226 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1309555) CELIA ACOSTA SCOTT, OPINION Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Irma Poole Asbury and John W. Vineyard, Judges.1 Affirmed. Avrek Law Firm, Maryam Parman; Bisnar | Chase, Brian D. Chase and H. Gavin Long for Plaintiff and Appellant. 1 Judge Vineyard struck the punitive damages allegations and prayer; Judge Asbury granted partial nonsuit and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. JRS Products, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Hoch v. Allied-Signal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API