Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1911No. 2701PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Hamilton. March 24, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

This is an action for damages, brought by Odessa Davis against the City of Eome. The municipality complains of a judgment refusing a motion for a new trial. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $500. The several attacks upon the petition which were suggested in the written argument can not be considered, because it does not appear that there was any demurrer. The plaintiff proved her case as laid; and the defendant introduced no testimony. According to the testimony in behalf of the plaintiff, the young lady was riding in a-buggy, accompanied by an escort, on her way to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Burrill v. . BoardmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Mayor & Council v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. City of Omaha v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Cleveland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. PinyanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Fields v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Brown v. Service Coach Lines Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API