Bedard v. TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.
The defendant, the Town of Alexandria (Town), appeals an order of the Superior Court (Vaughan, J.) denying its motion for attorney’s fees. The plaintiffs, Roger and Judith Bedard, cross-appeal the court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. The plaintiffs own and operate a sandpit covering approximately 7.9 acres in Alexandria. Wesley Platts, an owner of land abutting the sandpit, is a “disapproving abutter” for purposes of RSA chapter 155-E, the statute that governs local regulation of excavations. Pursuant to the statute,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Merrimack School District v. National School Bus Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Portsmouth Country Club v. Town of GreenlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Coco v. JaskunasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert Jesurum v. WBTSCC Limited Partnership & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Frost v. COM'R, NEW HAMPSHIRE BANKING DEPT.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- In re MallettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Frost v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Banking DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Gregory Baldwin v. City of Estherville, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.