Legal Opinion

Sibarco Stations, Inc. v. Town Board

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the proceedings remitted to Special Term with directions to dismiss the petition upon the ground that enactment of the Town of Vestal Local Law No. 3 (1968) has rendered the issues herein moot, inasmuch as the petitioner-respondent acquired no rights solely from the issuance of the permit to it which survived the change in the applicable law (see Rice v. Van Vranken, 225 App. Div. 179, affd. 255 N. Y. 541; Matter of Poczatek v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Huntington, 26 A D 2d 556). The new 1968…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Concordia Collegiate Institute v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Epstein v. WeisserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. Epstein v. WeisserNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Town of Orangetown v. MageeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Cornell University v. BagnardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Reichenbach v. Windward at SouthamptonNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Berman v. WarshavskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Loudon House LLC v. Town of ColonieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API