Legal Opinion

State v. Netling

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 7, 1987No. 8876-2-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.

William Netling and Peter Murphy appeal their convictions for delivery of a controlled substance. RCW 69.50.401(c). The issue on appeal is whether the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment as applied to the states by the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States and/or article 1, section 9 of the Washington Constitution or the provisions of RCW 10.43-.050 bars the prosecutions for this offense because of previous pleas of guilty to the lesser included offense of possession of a controlled substance. RCW 69.50.401(d).

We affirm, holding that neither double jeopardy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. RoybalWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. SchoelWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. RidgleyWashington Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BowermanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. State v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API