Legal Opinion

Ballestrero v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1925No. 4403PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was convicted under an indictment which alleged that he had violated the Harrison Anti-Narcotie Act, as amended February 24, 1919 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6287g), “in that the said defendant did then and there knowingly, willfully, unlawfully and feloniously purchase, sell, dispense and distribute a certain derivative of coca leaves, to wit, one bindle of cocaine containing approximately eighteen grains, which said cocaine was not then and there originally in and from the original stamped package.”

It is contended that the indictment is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Wong SingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Pierriero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  3. Sam Wong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. Dean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
  5. Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Perez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  3. Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  4. Barton v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  5. Lowrance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API