Legal Opinion

Birdsall v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided February 27, 1967No. 67-1-CivPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION

ATKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs ■ have filed a Complaint to compel the return of tax records and documents and to suppress their use.

This cause came on for hearing upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary Injunction to prevent the Government’s use of the records and documents for the purpose of obtaining an indictment against the Plaintiffs. Jurisdiction of the Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a). The Court granted Plaintiffs’ oral Motion to Amend Complaint to recite the amount in controversy required.

The Court has heard and con- • sidered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Goodman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. O'CONNORDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
  4. Hair Industry, Ltd., Adorable Hair-Do Corp., Howard Tresses, Inc., George Rosen and Ruth Rosen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. Application of LeonardoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cook v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API