Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 1, 1984No. 44,554; ACM S25555PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

In seven specifications appellant was charged with offenses involving marihuana, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. He pleaded not guilty to four of the specifications, but a special court-martial convened at Homestead Air Force Base, Florida, found him guilty as charged and sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement and partial forfeitures for 4 months and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening and supervisory authorities approved these results; the Unit*460ed States Air Force Court of Military Review…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. ZubkoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. RichardsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. HendricksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. MilesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. Specialist CHISTOPHER J. MATTHEWS (2d Corrected Copy)Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  4. United States v. BaranU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. BlaisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API