Legal Opinion

Minebea Co., Ltd. v. Papst

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 13, 2005No. CIV.A.97-0590 PLFPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*35 MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Papst’s remaining objections to the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation No. 6 (“R & R 6”). The Court has reviewed R & R 6, Papst’s objections, Minebea’s opposition and Papst’s reply, Minebea’s request for clarification of the April 29, 2005 Order and Papst’s comments thereto. The majority of Papst’s objections to R & R 6 were already resolved in this Court’s oral ruling of October 19, 2004. This Opinion addresses Papst’s remaining objections to the Special Master’s conclusions with respect to (a)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. In re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  4. Katz v. AT & T Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Kazee, Inc. v. LeachDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API