Minebea Co., Ltd. v. Papst
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
*35 MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Papst’s remaining objections to the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation No. 6 (“R & R 6”). The Court has reviewed R & R 6, Papst’s objections, Minebea’s opposition and Papst’s reply, Minebea’s request for clarification of the April 29, 2005 Order and Papst’s comments thereto. The majority of Papst’s objections to R & R 6 were already resolved in this Court’s oral ruling of October 19, 2004. This Opinion addresses Papst’s remaining objections to the Special Master’s conclusions with respect to (a)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- In re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Katz v. AT & T Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Kazee, Inc. v. LeachDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020