In re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are defendants’ and plaintiffs’ motions to reconsider Magistrate Judge Kay’s Order of April 19, 1994.1 Defendants argue that Magistrate Judge Kay wrongly decided that (1) “the waiver is to be narrowly construed and limited to those other documents addressing the same specific subject matter as the documents already produced” and (2) plaintiffs have not yet put their knowledge at issue. Plaintiffs argue in their motion to reconsider that Magistrate Judge Kay wrongly decided (1) to extend the subject-matter waiver…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Hertzberg v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Griffith v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
- St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.