Legal Opinion
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Virginia
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided December 20, 1995No. Civ. A. 3:95cv420PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
The defendants, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia and Healthkeepers, Inc. (collectively “Trigon”), have moved to strike the demand for a jury trial filed by the plaintiffs, The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation and Colonial Williamsburg Hotel Properties, Inc. (collectively “CWF”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to strike is granted.
BACKGROUND
The claims asserted in this action are based solely on the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et. seq. (“ERISA”). Specifically, CWF claims that Trigon: breached the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lamberty v. Premier Millwork and Lumber Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Ellis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Cherepinsky v. Sears Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- Allison v. Continental Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Termini v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.