Robinson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a conviction of two counts of incest pursuant to D.C.Code 1981, § 22-1901. Appellant argues (1) that the preindictment delay violated his constitutional rights; (2) that the two counts of incest were improperly joined; and (3) that the trial judge erred in failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, that corroboration of the testimony of the complainant was required. 1 After careful consideration of these claims in light of the record before us, we find them unpersuasive and accordingly affirm the convictions.
I
At trial the complainant testified that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Branch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jaggers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bowler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.