Legal Opinion

Robinson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1982No. 80-1204PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction of two counts of incest pursuant to D.C.Code 1981, § 22-1901. Appellant argues (1) that the preindictment delay violated his constitutional rights; (2) that the two counts of incest were improperly joined; and (3) that the trial judge erred in failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, that corroboration of the testimony of the complainant was required. 1 After careful consideration of these claims in light of the record before us, we find them unpersuasive and accordingly affirm the convictions.

I

At trial the complainant testified that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Branch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Jaggers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Bowler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API