Legal Opinion

Diamond v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 1, 2009No. 08 Civ. 7562(SHS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Elizabeth Diamond brings this ERISA action for insurance benefits allegedly due to her from defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. The parties have now each moved for summary judgment. Because Reliance’s decision to terminate Diamond’s benefits was arbitrary and capricious, this Court grants plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, orders defendant to reinstate Diamond’s disability benefits pursuant to her insurance policy, and denies Reliance’s motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed.

While…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Nina Green-Younger v. Joanne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Liberty Mut. Grp. Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Tortora v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Gaud-Figueroa v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
  4. Rund v. JPMorgan Chase Group Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Martucci v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API