Legal Opinion
Local 353, AFSCME, Council 4 v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 6, 2001No. File No. CV98 145898PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDoherty, J.
The plaintiff Local 353, AFSCME, Council 4, AFL-CIO (union), and the defendant, the city of Waterbuiy (city), are parties to a collective bargaining agreement that provides for the arbitration of grievances. Under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement, the union filed a grievance against the city that was subsequently submitted to arbitration before a panel from the state board of mediation and arbitration (arbitration panel). The parties submitted the following joint issue to the arbitration panel: “Did the City violate the collective bargaining agreement by not requiring the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Town of Stratford v. International Ass'n of FirefightersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Metropolitan District Commission v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 4, Local 184Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Board of Education v. Local 818, Council 4Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Local 353, AFSCME, Council 4, AFL-CIO v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003