Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 28, 1987No. 05-86-00189-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Justice.

For prescribing narcotic drugs, primarily Percodan, where “not necessary or required,” and for “grossly over-prescribing” those drugs, and for failing to make complete notations of narcotic prescriptions on the patients’ dental records, the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners suspended the license of Charles W. Sizemore, D.D.S., for five years, all but 120 days of which was probated, and revoked his certificate to prescribe narcotics. The trial court upheld the Board’s decision and he appeals to this court. We find that the revocation is not supported by substantial evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. National Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. BlaggTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Dotson v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersTexas Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. SizemoreTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Silagi, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
  3. Hermenia Jenkins v. Crosby Independent School District and Michael L. Williams in His Official Capacity as State Commissioner of Education, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Sizemore v. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  5. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Silagi, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API