Legal Opinion
Van Steenburg v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 30, 1997PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mugglin, J.), entered April 3, 1996 in Delaware County, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiff Ruth Van Steenburg (hereinafter plaintiff) and her spouse commenced this action seeking damages for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff when she slipped and fell in the produce aisle of one of defendant’s supermarkets. Following joinder of issue and discovery, plaintiff moved to compel defendant to respond to her notice to admit, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maiorano v. Price Chopper Operating Company, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Browne v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- McClarren v. Price Chopper Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Bashaw v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Salty v. Altamont AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by14 opinions
- Joachim v. 1824 Church Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Britto v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Yioves v. T.J. Maxx, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Mancini v. Quality Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Edwards v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.