Legal Opinion

People v. Black

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1987No. Nos. 5-85-0727, 5-86-0020, 5-86-0031, 5-86-0199 consPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

In each of these appeals, the office of the State Appellate Defender (O.S.A.D.) claims the existence of a conflict of interest which precludes it from providing effective representation. O.S.A.D. seeks leave to withdraw in each case and requests appointment of counsel outside the agency. The State contests the claim that O.S.A.D.’s representation places it in conflict with defendants’ respective interests and suggests that if a district office of O.S.A.D. is confronted with an actual conflict of interest in any of these appeals, the appropriate remedy would be to transfer the appeal to a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. The People v. StovalIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. CosletIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. T.M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. People v. ShottsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. In Re TMAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. People v. ShottsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API