Legal Opinion

Springfield F. & M. Insurance v. McKinnon & Call

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1883No. Case No. 4877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Hill. Tried below before the Hon. D. 0. Bolinger, special judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice. —

The policy upon which this action was based was delivered to Golledge, the party insured, on the 10th day of July, 1882, and contained the following clause: “ This insurance may be terminated at any time at the request of the assured, in which case the company shall retain only the customary short rates for the time the policy has been in force; the insurance may also be terminated at the option of the company, on giving notice to-that effect and refunding a ratable proportion of the premium for-the unexpired term of the policy.”

The premium was not paid, it being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Bergson v. Builders Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Colonial Assurance Co. v. National Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  2. Miller v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Polemanakos v. Austin Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Gill v. Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API