Legal Opinion

Beskin v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1930No. 19583. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants, Rudolph Beskin, Nathan Blitzstein and Herman Kaplan, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed their bill in the circuit court of Cook county to restrain the enforcement by the city of Chicago of an ordinance passed May 19, 1926, regulating and licensing junk dealers. The case was heard upon a stipulation of fact. Appellants offered to prove certain other facts, but objections were sustained to the offer. The chancellor dismissed the bill for want of equity and an appeal has been prosecuted to this court, the trial court having certified that the validity of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Banta v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Chicago v. MatthiesIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Smolensky v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. City of Chicago v. AdelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aliotta v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Village of East Alton v. ArstIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. City of Kewanee v. Riverside Industrial Materials Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  4. Baily v. McElroyWarren County Probate Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API