Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 6, 1976No. ACM 22000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LeTARTE, Chief Judge:

Despite his pleas, the accused was convicted of robbery and wrongful appropriation, in violation of Articles 122 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 922,921. The approved sentence extends to bad conduct discharge, total forfeitures, confinement at hard labor for 18 months and reduction in grade to airman basic.

Initially, appellate defense counsel contend that the military judge “inadequately considered” the accused’s unlawful pretrial confinement in adjudging the sentence. We find no merit in this contention. The only “evidence” introduced at…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. BayhandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. BurneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. DiMatteoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. ThomasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  3. United States v. CulbersonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  4. United States v. GreyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. AdamsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API