Legal Opinion

Smith v. the Abandoned Vessel

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 27, 2009No. Civil Action H-07-784PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.

On December 29, 2008, the Court commenced a non-jury trial in the above entitled matter. During the course of the two-day proceeding, the Court took evidence and heard sworn testimony. Having considered the evidence, testimony and oral argument presented during the trial, post-trial submissions, and applicable law, the Court now enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. 1 Any finding of fact that should be construed as a conclusion of law is hereby adopted as such. Any conclusion of law that should be…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northeast Research, LLC v. One Shipwrecked VesselCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Aqua Log, Inc. v. Lost & Abandoned Pre-Cut Logs & Rafts of LogsDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
  3. Aqua Log, Inc. v. Lost & Abandoned Pre-Cut Logs & Rafts of LogsDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
  4. Aqua Log, Inc. v. Lost & Abandoned Pre-Cut Logs & Rafts of LogsDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API