Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Brush
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 15, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The question here propounded concerns the propriety of the rejection by the administratrix of a claim for $8,000 presented by one Mary F. Robinson. The proof of claim reads in part as follows: “ That the consideration of said debt is a contract entered into by the decedent and the deponent eighteen years, ago for the care and maintenance of himself and his wife, Mary A. Brush, for three or four months during each summer during the term of their natural lives under specific agreement that he will leave a suitable sum to the claimant under his last will for the care and *582maintenance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKeon v. . Van SlyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hamlin v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- In re BlakeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- Shirk v. BrookfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- In re BucklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of HeaneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Du FlonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re the Petition of McLarenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930