Legal Opinion
O'Connell v. Taney
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 15, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Superior Oourt of the Gity of Denver.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hayt
As the amended complaint was filed by leave of court, it superseded the original, and need only be considered. :* .
In this pleading Patrick Taney,’ appellee, as plaintiff; made John O’Connell, Katharine O’Connell, Jno. Sheehañ;. *354¥m. C. Graves and J. F. Conroy defendants. It alleges that on the 30th day. of June, 1885, plaintiff recovered a judgment in the superior court of the city of Denver against said defendant John O’Connell for the sum of $2,262.30 and costs of suit; that afterwards a transcript of said judgment was filed in the office of the clerk and recorder of Arapahoe county. That…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. MackeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
- President of the Gardiner Bank v. WheatonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1832
3Cited by9 opinions
- Daniels v. BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Reed v. MunnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Wells v. Schuster-Hax National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- Walker v. StaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Robison v. GumaerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.