Legal Opinion

Rice v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 5, 1966No. 5215PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hugh M. Bland, Justice.

Appellant, James Eice, alias James Eobinson, and one Stanley Eobinson, were charged by information with forgery and uttering. The State alleged that they forged a check in the amount of Thirty-Eight Dollars and Twenty Cents ($38.20) on the J. 0. Eobinson Plumbing Company payable to Stanley Eobinson and signed J. 0. Eobinson Plbg. This check was drawn on the Benton State Bank and the check was cashed at the Saline Hardware Company.

Stanley Eobinson pleaded guilty to the charges of forgery and uttering and was sentenced to the State Penitentiary. Appellant was tried before…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hummel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Lauderdale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Edens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. Ball v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. DuBois v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API