Legal Opinion

Hallam v. Southern Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1927No. 26,356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment entered in the district court. The only assignment of error is that the conclusions of law are not justified or supported by the findings of fact.

Stating the facts found by tbe court in very brief form, it appears that the Blekre Tire & Rubber Company, a corporation, was engaged in manufacturing and selling automobile tires and tubes;- that on February 9, 1925, the defendant issued to this company a policy of credit insurance, insuring it against loss due to the insolvency of debtors who had or should purchase tires and tubes from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Veigel v. ConverseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liquidation of Farmers State Bank of North BranchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Turner v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API