Parsley v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO DEPT. OF PUBLIC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WATSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff asserts defendant interfered with her rights under the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et. seq. (“FMLA”) by requiring her to recertify her need for intermittent leave every thirty days, and by terminating her employment. Plaintiff also brings state law claims for disability discrimination and retaliation.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies plaintiffs summary judgment motion and grants defendant’s summary judgment motion in part and denies…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- NIXON v. ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER CORPORATIONDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2024