Legal Opinion

United States v. Garduño

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 6, 2007No. 06-2317PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendant-Appellant Nadine' Garduño pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and assault resulting in serious bodily injury for her role in a fatal car accident. After sentencing, Garduño filed a motion to withdraw her guilty plea, which the district court denied as barred by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. On appeal, Garduño argues that Rule 11 did not bar the district court from granting her motion.

Garduño also appeals the sentence imposed by the district court. Although the notice of appeal was filed after the time limitations in Federal Rule…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Reyes-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Kelley v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Emann v. LattureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. RandallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API