Steenhuis v. TODD'S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Justice.
1. "Upon hearing for an interlocutory injunction, if the evidence 'for the complainant is strong, and that for the defendant weak, or even if it be in practical equipoise, the injunction should be granted or refused according to the peculiar circumstances of the particular case. There should be a balance of conveniences, and a consideration whether greater harm might result from refusing than from granting the relief prayed for. If the grant of an injunction in such a case would operate oppressively to the defendant, the restraining order should be refused; but if it appears…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Everett v. TaborSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Jones v. Lanier Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Ballard v. WaitesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Maddox v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alston & Bird LLP v. Mellon Ventures II, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Bailey v. BuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Slautterback v. Intech Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Lambert v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Nunn Better Enterprises, Inc. v. Marietta Lanes, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.