Legal Opinion
Ballard v. Waites
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 15, 1942No. 14231PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. In dealing with interlocutory injunctions the Code declares: “The granting and continuing of injunctions ' shall always rest in the sound discretion of the judge, according to the circumstances of each case. The power shall be prudently and cautiously exercised, and except in clear cases should not be resorted to.” § 55-108. If the chancellor in refusing an injunction bases his refusal on the fact that the evidence was in conflict, and it appears that the evidence was in fact in conflict, or if the chancellor, in a case where the evidence was in fact in conflict, enters a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Everett v. TaborSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Jones v. Lanier Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Chestatee Pyrites Co. v. Cavenders Creek Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Hill v. Wadley Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Childs v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Maddox v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Zant v. DickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Milton Frank Allen Publications, Inc. v. Georgia Ass'n of Petroleum Retailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.