Walker v. MACKEY
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
Petition eor Rehearing
Before Brand*, Chief Justice, and Rossman, Lusk, Latourette**, Warner and Tooze, Justices.
Petition denied.
TOOZE, J.
Defendant Ena Fay Mackey petitions for a rehearing.
Defendant in her petition alleges that this court *212erred in its statement of the facts of the case and in reaching certain legal conclusions.
It is frankly conceded that in our opinion we did inadvertently misstate some of the facts and, therefore, welcome this opportunity to correct such error. Among other things, we said:
“It did not appear until the trial of the case that the defendant State Highway…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- McAllister v. HarmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Miner v. ZweifelOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Goddard v. American Queen Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1899