People v. Grafton
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*781OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
As the Appellate Division recognized, the factors to be considered by that court on a motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 are not the same as those determining the reasonableness of an appellant’s request for an extension of time to perfect an appeal. We cannot say that the Appellate Division erred as matter of law in concluding that the period April 20 to August 30, 1985 was reasonable and therefore excludable (CPL 30.30 [4]) on the factors presented in this case.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- People v. KarpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. ScottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. AaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BrantleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.