Schleimer v. Empire Mutual Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The issue in this case is whether an insurer of an automobile is under a duty to give notice to a party named as loss payee ” of cancellation of the policy.
A party so designated has generally been considered to be a mere appointee with the right to receive the proceeds of the loss to the extent of his interest. Under a limited loss payable clause the rule is that if the policy is not collectible by the insured, the appointee cannot recover (5A Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice, § 3335, pp. 143, 144, 146). There are, of course, loss payable clauses which more fully protect the interests of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- East Side Garage, Inc. v. New Brunswick Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gallant v. Lake States Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Chemical Bank v. United States Lines (S.A.), Inc. (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Old Kent Bank of Holland v. Chaddock, Winter & AlbertsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Vargas v. Nautilus InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Schleimer v. Empire Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974