Legal Opinion

United States v. Thompson

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided February 2, 1989No. CIV 84-0314 JCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CONWAY, District Judge.

THIS MATTER came on for consideration of the Alexandre Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed February 13, 1987; 1 Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, filed April 1, 1987; and Defendants’ Joint Motion in Limine, or Alternatively, Motion to Strike, filed June 1, 1987. The Court has reviewed the motions and memoranda submitted by the parties and heard the oral argument of counsel on September 8, 1988. Being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court finds that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is well-taken and will…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water & Rights v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API