Legal Opinion

People v. Dikeman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 12, 1976No. 27162PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

The district attorney brings this appeal solely on a question of law pursuant to section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973. A jury acquitted the defendant of first-degree assault. The issue is whether the trial court erred in permitting defense counsel to question a witness called by defendant when defense counsel knew that the witness would claim, in the presence of the jury, a valid privilege not to answer the question on the grounds of self-incrimination.

The defendant and Mark Benning were charged with first-degree assault against the person of John Martinez. The charge against Benning was dismissed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Emanuel JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. United States v. Marcelle LacoutureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. De Gesualdo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RollinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. FletcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Porth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. NewtonColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API