Legal Opinion

Angelica Garza Duque v. Wells Fargo, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 2015No. 01-13-00621-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Rebeca Huddle, Justice

Angelica Garza Duque sued Wells Fargo, N.A., seeking to enforce a consent judgment to which she is not a party and prevent foreclosure on her home. The parties each filed a traditional motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted Wells Fargo’s motion and denied Düque’s motion. Duque appeals. We hold that Duque lacks standing to enforce the consent judgment and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Background

Duque purchased a home in 2006. To do so, she obtained a mortgage loan from World Savings Bank, FSB, and executed a promissory note and deed of trust…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Bank of New York MellonColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Terry Revell v. Morrison Supply Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Pelletier v. InterBankDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API