United States v. White
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
We must decide whether trial counsel’s argument at sentencing exceeded the bounds of fair comment by mentioning facts not in evidence and, if so, whether the error warrants a rehearing on sentence. We conclude that the argument was improper; however, under the facts of this case, appellant is entitled to no relief.
I
Appellant was tried before a special court-martial composed of officer members at Fort McNair, Washington, D.C. Pursuant to his pleas, he was convicted of a single instance of wrongfully, using cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. CliftonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. MeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. KropfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. Robles-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. StargellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.