Legal Opinion

Dagnall v. Dagnall

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 29, 1915No. 9039PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before Gary, J., Laurens, April, 1914. Action by Elizabeth Dagnall against John T. Dagnall. Erom a decree denying an application for alimony, the plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. cites: 1 McC. Ch. 205; 10 Rich. Eq. 163; 68 S. C. 125; Tiffany, Dorn. Relations, 177, 179, 184; 3 Rich. 183; 2 DeS. 45 ; 4 DeS. 33; lb. 571. - •

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an action for alimony. The issues of law and fact were referred to a referee who found against the plaintiff. The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Common Pleas. In that Court the report was affirmed and from that judgment this appeal is taken. There are twenty-one exceptions. The appellant discusses in argument four questions, one of law and three questions of fact, as follows :

“It is respectfully submitted his Plonor, the Circuit Judge, rested his view of the law upon the case of Hair v. Hair, 31 S. C. Eq. (10 Rich. Eq.)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Levin v. LevinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scheper v. ScheperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Simonds v. SimondsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Shearer v. ShearerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  4. Simonds v. SimondsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API