Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Dolge
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 27, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff and Alice A. Armstrong were married in 1921. The plaintiff claimed that they lived happily together with their two children until the summer of 1941, when the defendant effectually broke up their home. The defendant has appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $9000 based on the alienation by the defendant of the affections of Mrs. Armstrong.
The defendant has made an energetic but unconvincing attack on the finding. No corrections in or additions to the finding can be made which will materially affect the trial court’s conclusion. The evidence supports the finding…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Richmond v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- State v. MoscaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Valentine v. PollakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Spencer's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Facey v. MerkleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Chykirda v. YanushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Rischall v. BauchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Palladino v. NardiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.