Legal Opinion

Ehrlich & Co. v. King

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1926No. 16275PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Since a claimant of property levied upon, where no right, title, or interest whatsoever appears in the defendant in execution, is required, in order to sustain his claim, to show only some title or interest in the property superior to the right of the plaintiff to proceed with the execution, title in the claimant to a fractional interest in the property is sufficient to support a finding in his favor. See, in this connection, Wade v. Hamilton, 30 Ga. 450 (2); Deariso v. Lawrence, 3 Ga. App. 580 (2) (60 S. E. 330).

2. A claimant upon whom was the burden of proof successfully carried that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wade & Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  2. Deariso & Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scruggs v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Chattooga County Bank v. SelmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Henderson v. FloodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Pritchett v. BagbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Cox v. HargroveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API