Deariso & Co. v. Lawrence
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Claim, from city court of Ashburn — Judge Hawkins. October 9, 1907.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
On February 5, 1903, Johnson sold a mule to Hobby, the defendant in fi. fa., and took a purchase-money note in which he reserved the title to the mule until the note was paid. This instrument was duly witnessed and recorded. On this note payments were made from time to time. On March 29, 1905, Deariso & Company obtained judgment against Hobby. On April • 4, 1905, execution was issued and duly recorded. On March 9, 1906, this execution was levied on the mule above referred to. For some reason the property was not brought to sale promptly, and in the fall of 1906 Hobby let Johnson have the mule…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rowland v. Gregg & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Ruker v. WomackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- MacIntyre & Co. v. Ferst's Sons & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Moody v. MillenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Black v. Gate City Coffin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Andrews v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Booze v. NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Ehrlich & Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Luther Williams Bank & Trust Co. v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.