Legal Opinion

Quinn, Gent, Buseck & Leemhuis, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1992No. 431 C.D. 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

147 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 141 (1992)

606 A.2d 1300

QUINN, GENT, BUSECK AND LEEMHUIS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, Petitioner,

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 9, 1991.

Decided April 8, 1992.

Frank L. Kroto, Jr., for petitioner.

John Herzog, for respondent.

Before CRAIG, President Judge, and DOYLE, COLINS, PALLADINO, McGINLEY, SMITH and PELLEGRINI, JJ.

SMITH, Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether an employer's total ban on smoking within the workplace constitutes cause of a necessitous and compelling nature to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Genetin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Monaco v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Bowman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API