Legal Opinion

Ciulla v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1930No. 12946Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant first insists that we erred in holding or assuming that Letha Scott made a parol assignment or a delivery of the thousand dollar policy to Daniels. We will let the witnesses answer this contention. Letha Scott testified:

“I never did turn that thousand dollar policy over to Mr. Ciulla. Daniels had-that thousand dollar policy. I gave it to him to get his funeral expenses out of it; that is what I turned it over to him for.”

Daniels testified:

“Letha Scott had turned that policy over to me. The purpose for which she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmick v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Briggs v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API