Legal Opinion

Schmick v. Bateman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1890No. 6636PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Eastland. Tried below before Hon. L. W. Campbell, Special District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

August 27,1883, and for some time —On prior to that date, B. R. Ramey did a mercantile and other-business in the name of his wife, A. 0. Ramey, and there is no claim that Mrs. Ramey had separate estate. On that date the husband made a contract in the name of his wife, whereby he bound her in terms to sell and deliver to the Mills Cattle Company a certain number of cattle at a fixed price by October 1, 1883. When that contract was executed in the name of the wife by the husband he received in advance $3000, and to secure the cattle company he executed a bond in the sum…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Osborn v. KoenigheimTexas Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Purdom v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Hayden Saddlery Hardware Co. v. Ramsay & FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Lennox v. Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API