Holloway v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
An allegedly defective automobile wheel assembly provides yet another occasion to examine Michigan products liability law. The specific question is whether the trial court correctly awarded defendant General Motors a directed verdict because no proofs were introduced which would indicate or permit the reasonable inference that the right front ball joint assembly was defectively designed, constructed with defective material, or improperly assembled. The Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court’s decision, and we likewise believe that a directed verdict was properly awarded for defendants.
On…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Holloway v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Sundberg v. Keller LadderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Chambers v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Flinn v. Sun Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.